2017 8月、9月矽谷房市行情報告

 

八月、九月的市場行情報告,反應的正是今年暑假的市況,我的Broker說,今年的房市是前所未有的熱烈,其實觀察周末看房人潮、下offer數,以及下列表格所呈現的Days to Sell (上市到成交所需天數),包括加價率也維持高檔,市況依然是供不應求,且相較於去年同期的成交量,其實listing數並沒有減少,成交天數減少許多,可見市場買氣非常濃厚。

最近在Sunnyvale看房,很多賣房主都是離開矽谷到外州、退休族群,房價維持高檔,換房者減少,其實不利於房市健康。 每一位將要買房的人,我都會告知,現在可是歷史高點,謹慎入市。但是如果你問我,房價會不會跌,目前經濟大環境很樂觀,矽谷就業機會多,有「信心」買房的客戶群不減,即使升息傳聞不斷,估計現在到明年房市,依然會溫和上漲。

 

 

Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Postal City is 'Sunnyvale' Property Type is 'Residential' Property Sub Type is one of 'Single Family Home', 'Condominium', 'Townhouse' Results calculated from approximately 920 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Postal City is ‘Sunnyvale‘ Property Type is ‘Residential’ Property Sub Type is one of ‘Single Family Home’, ‘Condominium’, ‘Townhouse’ Results calculated from approximately 920 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Postal City is 'Mountain View' Property Type is 'Residential' Property Sub Type is one of 'Single Family Home', 'Condominium', 'Townhouse' Results calculated from approximately 580 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Postal City is ‘Mountain View‘ Property Type is ‘Residential’ Property Sub Type is one of ‘Single Family Home’, ‘Condominium’, ‘Townhouse’ Results calculated from approximately 580 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Postal City is 'Los Altos' Property Type is 'Residential' Property Sub Type is one of 'Single Family Home', 'Condominium', 'Townhouse' Results calculated from approximately 360 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Postal City is ‘Los Altos‘ Property Type is ‘Residential’ Property Sub Type is one of ‘Single Family Home’, ‘Condominium’, ‘Townhouse’ Results calculated from approximately 360 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Postal City is 'Palo Alto' Property Type is 'Residential' Property Sub Type is one of 'Single Family Home', 'Condominium', 'Townhouse' Results calculated from approximately 450 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Postal City is ‘Palo Alto‘ Property Type is ‘Residential’ Property Sub Type is one of ‘Single Family Home’, ‘Condominium’, ‘Townhouse’ Results calculated from approximately 450 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Area Name is '8 - Santa Clara' Property Type is 'Residential' Property Sub Type is one of 'Single Family Home', 'Condominium', 'Townhouse' Results calculated from approximately 1,000 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Area Name is ‘8 – Santa Clara‘ Property Type is ‘Residential’ Property Sub Type is one of ‘Single Family Home’, ‘Condominium’, ‘Townhouse’ Results calculated from approximately 1,000 listings

 

Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Area Name is '5 - Berryessa' Property Type is 'Residential' Property Sub Type is one of 'Single Family Home', 'Condominium', 'Townhouse' Results calculated from approximately 830 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Area Name is ‘5 – Berryessa‘ Property Type is ‘Residential’ Property Sub Type is one of ‘Single Family Home’, ‘Condominium’, ‘Townhouse’ Results calculated from approximately 830 listings

 

MI
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Area Name is ‘6 – Milpitas‘ Property Type is ‘Residential’ Property Sub Type is one of ‘Single Family Home’, ‘Condominium’, ‘Townhouse’ Results calculated from approximately 490 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Postal City is 'Cupertino' Property Type is 'Residential' Property Sub Type is one of 'Single Family Home', 'Condominium', 'Townhouse' Results calculated from approximately 330 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Postal City is ‘Cupertino‘ Property Type is ‘Residential’ Property Sub Type is one of ‘Single Family Home’, ‘Condominium’, ‘Townhouse’ Results calculated from approximately 330 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Area Name is '3 - Evergreen' Property Type is 'Residential' Property Sub Type is one of 'Single Family Home', 'Condominium', 'Townhouse' Results calculated from approximately 860 listings
Time frame is from Oct 2016 to Sep 2017 Area Name is ‘3 – Evergreen‘ Property Type is ‘Residential’ Property Sub Type is one of ‘Single Family Home’, ‘Condominium’, ‘Townhouse’ Results calculated from approximately 860 listings

 

2016年4月最新行情/漲勢確立 各自表現

按照慣例,我又來寫MLS最新資料數據分析,四月的數據反映的是三月的房市,上個月我們歷經了平均開價相較去年跳漲10%的日子 應該很多人好奇三月市場的變化

其實從Agent每天在市場打滾的體驗,下的offer數與看房人數多寡,Buyer的出價勇敢度,大概都能感受到灣區房地產的市場溫度,三月我們與同事在出價時,正常的房子offer數都在10份左右,Sunnyvale則都有15份offer,跟天氣一樣,三月房市已經比二月來的溫暖。

除了漲勢再起,成交日也變短。市場如此,Buyer的加價實力不夠可是買不到房子,這幾個月尤其以Sunnyvale & Berryessa 市場更為火熱,買方加價力道十足,不分產品平均加價率漲至今年高點,成交數明顯稅減以下從MLS統計就能看出,就能房價已經高不可攀的Cupertino還是能看到成交天數縮短,加價率在攀升。West San Jose也是差不多的市況,但是我抓的數據只有顯示Single family(沒為什麼,獨厚我的客戶而已,他正在找這裡的House) 請大家見諒 ^^

再次聲明,每個區域、每個Zip Code都有好區跟差一點點的區域,學區、街廓、鄰居素質、是否靠近高速公路、鐵道或重大建設,都與房價息息相關,每間房子在每個人的心中顯示的價值都不一樣,每一個Agent出價之前都應該給客人近期成交數據分析,評估市場與客戶承擔能力,才進行出價。

若有問題歡迎來電、來信討論

 

SU

Apr 2015 to Mar 2016 Sunnyvale

 

BE
Apr 2015 to Mar 2016 Berryessa

 

Santa clara
Apr 2015 to Mar 2016 Santa Clara
CU
Apr 2015 to Mar 2016 Cupertino

 

West SJ house
Apr 2015 to Mar 2016 95129,95130 House only

 

讓我們一起為你的房子寫故事

Mingwei Business card

The API: 10 things parents should know

前兩天一個Cupertino 搬走的媽媽語重心長地告訴我

「我要是重新再選擇一次,我不會讓我孩子去念Monta Vista ,Pidmont High也很好啊,我兒子在MV只是前20%,他沒有高中生活,一直在念書,如果到競爭少一點點的學校,他會不會比較快樂我無法確定,但是他排名一定會很前面,史丹佛只要全校的第一名,在名校的孩子,實在很可憐...」

API分數常常是有孩子的家庭購買房子的參考指標,去年10月開始,Redfin重新調整學區分數,許多API落後的學校,突然變成9分10分,不管如何,API分數真的是百分之百的指標嗎? 你的孩子一定要爭破頭搶好學校嗎?

這裡有篇來自greatschools.org的文章,提供大家參考,讓你對所謂的API 分數有進一步的了解

1. The API is not a test.

Rather, the API is a school performance measurement system that was first developed as part of California’s 1999 Public Schools Accountability Act. Each year, the state calculates the Base API for each school to establish a baseline for the school’s academic performance, and it sets an annual target for growth. Each summer, the state announces the Growth API for each school, which reflects growth in the API from year to year.

The 2011 Base API, released in May 2012, is calculated using each school’s test results from the California Standards Tests (CSTs — state tests designed to see how students are learning state standards), the California Modified Assessment (CMA), the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) and the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE).

The 2012 Growth API, which will be released in September 2012, shows the school’s academic growth for the year. It is calculated in the same way as the 2011 Base API.

2. The API measures both school performance and improvement.

The API can be used to see how well a school did on tests in any given year, as well as to track school progress over time. Each year, parents can review a school’s API number, which shows how well it did relative to the state’s goal of 800, and also check the school’s growth from the previous year. To make it an accurate measure of school improvement, the Base API calculation only includes test results of students who were in the district during the previous school year. The Growth API is calculated using results of students from the current school year.

3. The API has very high stakes.

Due to the spotlight on API results from newspapers and the state, schools are under tremendous pressure to increase test scores and improve their APIs. While some argue that this pressure encourages schools to improve classroom instruction, others are afraid that schools will shortchange rich curricular programs in favor of test preparation drills.

4. The API measures academic performance, not school quality.

As a parent, you may have heard people say things like, “The school has an API of 750, so it must be a great school,” or “The API is only 550? What’s wrong with this school?” While these simple assessments are tempting, be careful about jumping to conclusions based on a school’s API alone. Before making any overall judgments about a school’s quality, be sure to look at its API improvement as well as other key factors, including teacher experience, parent involvement and special programs.

5. The API focuses on achievement for all students.

The API is designed to show how well schools are serving students across all ethnic and socioeconomic groups. For this reason, separate APIs are calculated for each of a school’s statistically significant subgroups, which include any ethnic groups that account for a significant percentage of the school’s population. If “numerically significant,” APIs are also calculated for a school’s socioeconomically disadvantaged students (students who qualify for the subsidized lunch program or who don’t have a parent with a high school degree), English learners, and students with disabilities.

6. Schools that don’t improve their APIs must get help.

If a school doesn’t meet its API growth target and has one of the lower Base APIs in the state, it may receive grants and special assistance to help with improvement efforts. If a school continues to fall short of its target, it may eventually be subject to strong local or state sanctions, including reassigning the principal (subject to a public hearing), reorganization or even school closure.

7. API results are for schools and districts only.

There is no such thing as an individual student API. The API is based on scores from the CSTs, the CMA, the CAPA and the CAHSEE. The API measures how a school’s or district’s academic performance improves from year to year.

8. The API has changed.

It used to include just the results of the norm-referenced tests — in the first years, the Stanford 9 tests and later the CAT/6. These tests compared California students to their peers nationwide. In recent years the emphasis has shifted to include more results from the CSTs, which more accurately reflect what California students are expected to learn in the classroom, and fewer results from the CAT/6. In early 2009, the CAT/6 Survey was eliminated entirely as a testing tool in the state.

In 2001-2002, CSTs in English language arts (for grades 2 through 11) were added to API calculations. Scores from CSTs in math (for grades 2 through 11), social science (for grades 10 and 11), and the CAHSEE were added in 2002-2003 to provide a more accurate picture of what students have learned. In 2003-2004, CST science tests in grades 9 through 11 and the CAPA in language and math in grades 2 through 11 were added. Since 2004-2005 even more indicators have been added. The API now includes the CST in science for grades 5 and 8 through 11 and in history-social science for grades 8 through 11. In 2008, the California Modified Assessment (CMA) was added to the API for grades 3 through 5. Grades 6 through 8 of the CMA were added in 2010.

9. The API is complicated.

If the whole topic of the API confuses you, you’re not alone. Educators and parents alike struggle to understand where the API comes from, how it’s calculated and what exactly it means. Here’s the bottom line: APIs range from 200 to 1000 and the goal for all schools is 800. The API is based on test scores and is calculated in a way that encourages schools to raise the test scores of the lowest-scoring students.

10. GreatSchools Ratings and the California API are different.

GreatSchools also calculates a rating on a scale of 1 to 10 based on California test results. There are several important differences between GreatSchools Ratings and California API Ranks:

  • API Ranks are created by the California Department of Education. GreatSchools Ratings are created by GreatSchools.
  • The API is calculated using results from the CSTs, CMA, CAHSEE, and the CAPA. GreatSchools Ratings are calculated using the CSTs only. For additional information on GreatSchools Ratings, check our frequently asked questions.
  • Some test subjects count more than others in the API.
  • The API includes all 5 levels of proficiency (far below basic, below basic, basic, proficient or advanced), each receiving a different number of points toward the total API. The API is calculated this way to encourage improvement in test scores. GreatSchools Ratings use only the percent of students who scored at the proficient and advanced levels. GreatSchools Ratings show how the percentage of students on grade level at a school compared to schools across the state.

 

 

舊金山灣區 南灣 房地產 201511月最新數據報告

淡季不淡,市況「蠢蠢欲動」

12月已經7日,忙到現在才有空檔寫寫最新的買氣報告。奇怪,不是淡季嗎?可是我還是好忙呀!

沒錯,是淡了一點,冬季買氣絕對不如夏季炙熱,但是市場依然溫暖,昨天(12/6)在South San Jose 幫同事Open House,來了17組共40人,套一句同事說的話,大家已經「蠢蠢欲動。」

前幾天參加一個美國華人經紀人的晚宴,Green Valley Realty受邀參加,我也很榮幸地參與其中,老闆與公司業績前幾名的同事不約而同地認為:「過了感恩節,大家都以為12月是淡季,準備過聖誕節並迎接新年,沒想到升息疑慮未減,房市依然蠢蠢欲動。」雖然11月釋出量少,導致成交量縮,但是數字會說話,好區的成交行情依然不為所動,繼續穩定維持小小的漲幅。

來看看11月的成交市況吧!(2015年11月MLS資料庫,反映2015年10月買氣)

先來看看南灣的綜合買氣,下列數據包括San Jose, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale, Cupertino, Saratoga, Los Gatos。再往下細看各地區分析。

All house
2014/12~2015/11 South Bay House Chart

Nov 2015平均加價率102.7 %  銷售天數達31

以下為主要City的成交市況

這是Sunnyvale只看 House的狀況

19 HOuse
2014/12~2015/11 Sunnyvale House Chart ↑

Sunnyvale House Nov 2015加價率 105.6%但是平均成交天數為13天,跟今年6月賣的一樣快。勝過於7月~10月需要15~19天才能賣掉。

18H
↑ 2014/12~2015/11 Cupertino House Chart

Cupertino 的House 11月平均加價率為103.9%,平均成交天數增加至33天,大家注意一下11月的加價率從10月後到底又微幅上升,市場果真是買盤還在,「跌不下去」,繼~續~漲!

8 House
↑ 2014/12~2015/11 Santa Clara House Chart

Santa Clara受惠於Sunnyvale & Cupertino 擴散效應影響,今年漲得很多,是矽谷地區百萬元還能買到好房子的地方,雖然沒有太多好學區,不過地點優勢,最近也是很多年輕人的新寵。平均加價率維持104.5%,成交天數也不離譜,24天還算是中間值。

5
2014/12~2015/11 Berryessa

Berryessa很好玩,買氣很穩定,大概都是20餘天成交,特別的是又看到除了Cupertino之外加價率回升的一區。

你想找房子嗎?

對其他區域有興趣嗎

歡迎利用以下方式與我聯繫

  • FB/電郵:chienmingwei@gmail.com
  • 微訊:maggiechien002
  • LINE:chienmingwei

灣區房地產201509月最新數據報告

Here is the latest market analysis by Maggie Chien.  I just finished house market research about South bay, part of east bay and also Berryessa.  Time frame is from Sep 2014 to Aug 2015.  Postal City is Palo alto, Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Cupertino, Fremont, Milpitas, Berryessa.  Property Type is Residential.  Property Sub Type is one of ‘Single Family Home’, ‘Condominium’, ‘Town house’.

一個月又過了,我為各位奉上九月初最新的市場資訊,不過八月成交狀況顯示的其實是六到七月的買氣,其中加價率可以解釋為購買力,部分區域雖然看見衰退,但是Palo alto (14.5%)、Mountian (12.6%)、Cupertino (11%)還是至少要加價一成才買的到房子,部分區域加價率稍有滑落,像是Sunnyvale從11%左右降至9%,Fremnot 小幅跌落1%降至加價率4.5%,Milpitas降至3.5%,Berryessa顯示持平狀態,加價率維持在5~6%之間。

加價率的調整,與市場需求、房價已高有很大的關係,這是最基本的經濟供需法則,市場上仍有買家相挺,但是如果有積極看屋者就知道,好房子實在不多,心裡滿意的,口袋都跟不上腳步,買得起的,都需要大力整裝一番,如果客人有實力,我乾脆建議他們買的便宜一點的爛房子,低於市價10%,把那個10%拿來裝修房屋,也可以選擇自己滿意的配備,不過當然不是每一個客人都有這種時間成本的。

以下為南灣、東灣部分地區平均在市場上的天數與加價率最新數字,僅有住宅類且不分產品,若需特殊區域、產品分析,請與我聯繫。

通常特殊市場分析,我經常用到是在出價之前,提供我的客戶該城市、該社區、或該屋近1 mile 以內類似產品的數據分析等,同學區、同性質產品近期銷售最新市況,合理出價,不是瞞天喊價。

Palo Alto Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio
Palo Alto Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio.

Palo Alto↑、Mountain View ↓成交天數維持低檔,6~7月加價率維持高水平,好屋難求、買盤強勁。

Mountain View Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio
Mountain View Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio
Sunnyvale Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio
Sunnyvale Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio

Sunnyvale & Cupertino 成交日期近三個月明顯拉長,↑Sunnyvale 加價率持續萎縮,Cupertino↓下圖 加價率見到彈升。

Cupertino Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio
Cupertino Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio
Berryessa Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio
Berryessa Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio

Berryessa 維持穩定,這地區因為產品好壞非常兩極,唯不少Owner occupied的房子,影響銷售天數頗大。

Milpitas Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio
Milpitas Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio

Fremnot & Milpitas地區成交天數維持穩定,加價率受到7/21地震影響,可能會稍微影響買氣。

Fremont Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio
Fremont Avg DOM & Sale to List Price Ratio

Sunnyvale 生活資訊推薦/生鮮雜貨

搬來Sunnyvale已經一年多,分享一下我愛逛愛買的好去處。

Grocery/生鮮雜貨

蔬果超市Felipe’s Market:墨西哥人開的蔬果店,也有販售有機蔬果、起司、蜂蜜、義大利麵、餅乾、堅果等乾貨,我很推薦這裡的蔬果,因為新鮮便宜,常有特價物,周六是我覺得最好撿便宜的時候,常常有些盒裝生菜、有機蔬菜特價,只是排隊要排久一些,如果怕浪費時間在排隊就周間下午五點前來吧。http://www.yelp.com/biz/felipes-market-sunnyvale

華人超市Ranch99:想念台灣食物就來這裡挖一挖寶,我只在這裡買乾貨、特價時的豆腐、義美零食,肉類個人覺得腥味太重,都到日超或是Costco買。 http://www.yelp.com/biz/99-ranch-market-mountain-view-2

日本超市NIJIYA:推薦牛肉片(火鍋用) 跟海鮮,我們家常吃牛肉火鍋、壽喜燒,肉、雞蛋就來自這裡,雖然價格貴些,但是品質真的好,有時買買鰻魚、豆皮做壽司,也販售很多來自日本醬料、零食、食材等。一秒到日本的感覺。

每個月29號是NIJIYA的Meat Day, 生鮮肉類打八折,但是我買過,都是冷凍的,解凍後品質並不佳,所以我還是想吃再買最新鮮的就好。

懶得煮飯的時候,NIJIYA熟食區有Beef Don (牛肉蓋飯)、壽司、便當、拉麵、咖哩飯等選擇,牛肉蓋飯不錯,還附上味僧湯。http://www.yelp.com/biz/nijiya-market-mountain-view

韓國超市HANKOOK:泡菜、韓國烤肉醃料、醃肉、熟食、韓式豆腐鍋、年糕、泡麵、柚子醬等等。蔬果區很乾淨。http://www.yelp.com/biz/hankook-supermarket-sunnyvale

Trader Joe’s:我很少到這裡逛,但是偶爾我會買買冷凍食物、甜點(馬卡龍、起司蛋糕,都在冷凍區)等 ,對了,這裡的花、植物最便宜。http://www.yelp.com/biz/trader-joes-sunnyvale-2

Whole Foods: 有機食物大全(新聞有說,這家比哪裡都貴XD),我們家並非有機食物信仰者,加上Felipe蔬果已經足夠我採購,我來這裡偶爾是買隻鴨子回家煮、最近則是很常買甜點,我推薦NY Cheese Cake,藍莓塔派之類的,價格很實惠。

Sunnyvale最新房源

2015年6 月,矽谷Sunnyvale房價再創新高

六月已經結束,我將Sunnyvale 行情整理一番。

數據全數來自MLS統計資料,我在這裡僅做Single Family的分析供參考,若須Condo, Townhouse資料,請找我洽詢,無論何種產品,我都將提供完整的數據分析,加價技巧,助您買房。

Sunnyvale House行情均價 $1,468,772 . 成交價格1.47million,成交量較前三個月縮減。平均成交天數13天。

成交量持續萎縮,但是買房出價動能依然強,

尤其在94087因為不少 Cupertino Union 與Cherry Chase好學區,加價幅度不減。

Sale price to list price ratio is 117.3% in Jun.

Time frame is from Jul 2014 to Jun 2015 Postal City is 'Sunnyvale' Property Type is 'Residential' Property Sub Type is 'Single Family Home' Results calculated from approximately 630 listings
Time frame is from Jul 2014 to Jun 2015
Postal City is ‘Sunnyvale’
Property Type is ‘Residential’
Property Sub Type is ‘Single Family Home’
Results calculated from approximately 630 listings

(點圖可以放大)

94087 (Sunnyvale, 因為有Homestead high, Cupertino好學區支撐,加價比率較高,民眾搶屋很積極)

“Sale price to list price ratio" is 117.3% in Jun, lower than 118.1% in May, higher than 116.3% in Apr.  Compare to 120.5~121.8% during Feb and Mar. Buyers don’t add as much money as 1st quarter.

Day to sell" in Jun of single family in 94087, only takes 10 average days to sell. Compare to 9 days in Feb and Mar, 11 days in Apr.  The ‘’Day to sell’’ in Jun means the market is still hot.

94086

“Sale price to list price ratio" is 109.7% in Jun, lower than 116.1% in May, 116.2% in Apr. .  Compare to about 111%,114% in Feb and Mar. Buyers don’t add as much money as 1st quarter.

“Day to sell" in Jun of single family in 94086, only takes 10 average days to sell. Compare to 21 and 11 days in Feb and Mar, 14 days in Apr.  The ‘’Day to sell’’ in Jun means the market is still hot.

Time frame is from Jan 2010 to Jun 2015 Postal City is 'Sunnyvale' Property Type is 'Residential' Property Sub Type is 'Single Family Home' Results calculated from approximately 3,300 listings
Time frame is from Jan 2010 to Jun 2015
Postal City is ‘Sunnyvale’
Property Type is ‘Residential’
Property Sub Type is ‘Single Family Home’
Results calculated from approximately 3,300 listings

這是近五年Sunnyvale價量,紅色為價、綠色為量,僅做Single Family的統計表。2015年僅統計到6月,因此量約一半,但是我大膽預估,因為高房價(買房躊躇)與周邊房價直漲(賣方賣了不知道該往哪裡住),今年成交量應會減縮,總成交量將低於過去四年的平均值。稍晚再來寫兵家必爭之地Cupertino!

2014年3月~2015年3月 中國人首次成為美房市最大海外買家

(大紀元記者李默迪綜合報導)美國房地產經紀人協會(National Association of Realtors)最新統計數據顯示,購買美國房產的國際客戶中,中國人首超加拿大人,購買量和消費額方面都是美國房市最大的海外買家。

據《華爾街日報》報導,調查涵蓋從2014年3月到2015年3月的時間範圍。所有在美國購買獨立房和公寓的國際客戶中,中國人佔16%,數量最多,而且比2013年的12%又有所增加。其次是加拿大和印度客戶,分別佔14%和8%。

從房產消費額來看,同期內國際客戶在美國的房產消費總額為922億美元,其中中國客戶為286億美元,同樣位居榜首,而且比2013年增加了30%。加拿大和印度分別為112億和79億美元。

《金融時報》報導,同期內,中國人在美國的人均房產消費額為196萬美元,比美國本土人多三倍。

中國客戶平均每套房產消費也是最高,為83.18萬美元,高於國際客戶的平均值(49.96萬美元),其次為加拿大、印度、墨西哥和英國,但他們都低於國際客戶平均值。

中國人喜歡海外購房 原因何在

中國房地產專家艾敬偉(Ai Jingwei,音譯)說,實際上中國人在國內的購房空間很有限,美國經濟和房市復甦後,中國人開始轉向美國購房。

Juwai.com是一個幫助中國客戶購買海外房產的網站,其聯合首席執行官安德魯•泰勒(Andrew Taylor)表示,美國現存房產和在建房都比較有潛力,而且國際客戶的購房政策很自由,所以成為中國買家海外購房的首選。

根據Juwai.com網站對客戶的調查結果,2015年第一季度,中國客戶在美國購房較多的地區是洛杉磯、紐約市、休斯頓、舊金山,以及奧蘭多。

比較各州的情況看,中國人在加州購房最多,佔他們總購房量的30%,其次是華盛頓、紐約、馬塞諸塞州、伊利諾斯州和德州。

中國客戶70%用現金支付房款,高於美國國際客戶的平均值(55%),而美國本土人士的現金支付率只有25%。

《金融時報》文章還提到,其實,從世界範圍來看,中國人也是西方各個大都市最大的房產買家,比如紐約、倫敦、悉尼、溫哥華、多倫多和奧克蘭等。

中國人大量湧入海外購房,主要是由於中國房產市場低迷,以及西方民主國家優質的教育體系和生活品質、完善的法律,以及買房後所享有的房產權。

但是業內人士認為,海外客戶,特別是中國人,對美國房市的需求的增加,會給美國本土人士帶來一定的負面影響。

MoneyWatch 專欄作家、在房產界有40年從業經歷的丹•巴納比克(Dan Barnabic)表示,美國大都市房產的這種高需求會導致房價不斷攀升,尤其是對美國中產階層人士來說,會超出他們的承受能力,進而使他們無力支付房產。現在一些城市正有這種趨勢,比如舊金山、紐約、丹佛、西雅圖等。

Ming Wei Chien (Maggie)
Cell: 408-505-3003
Email: chienmingwei@gmail.com
BRE #01973756

Green Valley Realty
Office: 408-512-5712 / Fax: 408-512-5717
19620 Stevens Creek Blvd. Ste 280
Cupertino, CA 95014